Get 2,500 events tracked for freeSign up now

Verticals

Coding agents read whole repositories, and context is the bill

A coding agent's cost is dominated by how much code it reads, and that grows with the repository rather than with the task. The same feature that makes the product good — give the agent more context — is the one that makes it expensive, and the two are difficult to trade off without knowing what a run costs.

What a provider dashboard leaves you with

  • 01

    Context regrowth: an agent re-reads the same files on every turn and the token count climbs through a session with nothing marking it.

  • 02

    Per-seat pricing sits on top of a per-run cost that nobody measures, so a heavy repository quietly inverts the margin.

  • 03

    Frontier models left in the test suite bill at frontier rates on every CI run.

What Capsera does about it

Attribution per run and per repository
A run is one agent invocation. Seeing cost at that grain is what makes a per-seat price defensible.
Hard limits on runaway sessions
A per-run ceiling stops a session that has started re-reading its own context, before the spend exists.
Framework-aware
Calls made through LangGraph, CrewAI, LangChain, LlamaIndex and AutoGen are attributed without threading a tag through every request.

The number this is judged on

Cost per run, and per seat

None of this is assumed. We scanned 133 public agent repositories and found a cost defect in most of the ones making live model calls.

Read the method and limitations

Know what a run costs before the seat price does.

Stop runaway agents before they become runaway invoices.

Try for free