Get 2,500 events tracked for freeSign up now

Verticals

Agents that spend money need the same controls as anything else that does

A research or analysis agent is a system that incurs cost autonomously. In an environment where every other such system has a limit, an approver and a record, an LLM credential with a notification-only cap is an outlier — and provider limits are commonly notification-only, which means the control is an email.

What a provider dashboard leaves you with

  • 01

    A shared key gives no per-desk or per-mandate attribution, so cost cannot be allocated to the team that incurred it.

  • 02

    A limit that alerts rather than blocks is not a limit; the spend already exists by the time anyone reads it.

  • 03

    Which agent made which call is not recoverable from a provider invoice.

What Capsera does about it

Enforcement, not notification
The budget is checked before the provider call and the call is refused. Alerts at 80%, hard stop at 100%.
Budgets at org, team and agent level
Envelopes that hold at the level the money is actually owned, rather than at whichever credential happened to be used.
Nothing stored
Capsera records cost and identity. Prompts and completions are never stored, so the governance layer does not become a second copy of the data.

The number this is judged on

Spend per desk, per mandate

None of this is assumed. We scanned 133 public agent repositories and found a cost defect in most of the ones making live model calls.

Read the method and limitations

Put a limit on it that actually holds.

Stop runaway agents before they become runaway invoices.

Try for free